翻訳と辞書 |
Milgram v. Orbitz : ウィキペディア英語版 | Milgram v. Orbitz
In ''Milgram v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC'',〔''Milgram v. Orbitz Worldwide, LLC'', (ESX-C-142-09 ) (N.J. Super. Ct. Aug. 26, 2010).〕 the New Jersey Superior Court held that online ticket resellers qualified for immunity under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (CDA), and that such immunity preempted a state law consumer fraud statute. The opinion clarified the court's test for determining whether a defendant is acting as a publisher, the applicability of the CDA to e-commerce sites, and the extent of control that an online intermediary may exercise over user content without becoming an "information content provider" under the CDA. The opinion was hailed by one observer as a "rare defeat for a consumer protection agency" and the "biggest defense win of the year" in CDA § 230 litigation. ==Background==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Milgram v. Orbitz」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|